Statement by the Permanent Representative of Cyprus
Ambassador Sotos Zackheos
to the 3rd Committee
on Agenda Item 114(b) and (c):
Human Rights questions, including alternative approaches
for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights
and fundamental freedoms
2 November 2000
My delegation has aligned itself with the statement delivered earlier in the debate on item 114 by the Representative of France on behalf of the European Union. I will, therefore, limit my remarks to some issues of particular interest to my delegation.
Madame
Chairperson,
My
delegation welcomes the greater emphasis attached to issues of human rights
worldwide, as testified, inter alia, by the prominence given to human rights
during the Millennium Assembly. Cyprus firmly believes that, in our approach to
human rights and the prevention of their violation, selectivity, associated with
political expediency, acts as an obstacle to the full enjoyment of human rights
and, often, prevents the implementation of the provisions of human rights
instruments. Another point that I would like to make is that in its involvement
in the search for solutions to conflicts, the United Nations should always by
guided by the need to safeguard human rights and fundamental freedoms. Solutions
based on ephemeral considerations and the practice of realpolitic, which often
work against the interests of small states, will only lead to a sense of
injustice and, therefore, fail to secure a durable peace.
One of the major issues that dominate the discussions on human rights is the question of impunity. If the international community does not effectively address this issue, holding state and non-state actors responsible for their actions, I am afraid that we will continue to witness violations of human rights on a large scale for the foreseeable future. Cyprus steadfastly supports the earliest possible establishment of an International Criminal Court, which, we hope, will deal in a decisive way with the question of impunity. In this respect we welcome the progress in the preparatory committee and the consensus reached on the rules of procedure and evidence and the elements of crime.
Madame
Chairperson,
The
continuing violations of human rights in my country, stemming from the Turkish
invasion and subsequent occupation of 37% of its territory, are well known and
have been the subject of many resolutions adopted by the United Nations, the
Commission of Human Rights, the Council of Europe, the Non-Aligned Movement, the
Commonwealth and other international and regional bodies.
The
question of human rights is one of the core issues that are currently under
discussion in the fifth round of proximity talks that have begun yesterday in
Geneva. The President of the Cyprus, Mr. Glafcos Clerides has expressed his
determination to work in good will in order to achieve a just and viable
solution to the Cyprus Problem, a solution that will safeguard the human rights
of all Cypriots without discrimination. Our side will pursue a solution based on
Security Council resolutions and the 1977 and 1979 High-Level Agreements between
the two sides but rejects any attempt that would lead to the segregation of the
people of Cyprus along ethnic lines, as the Turkish side demands with its
proposal for a confederation of two states and the recognition of the so-called
“realities”.
These
so-called “realities” are nothing more than the consequences of illegal acts
gone unpunished and the unacceptable partition imposed on my country through the
use of force and sustained by military strength, in violation of every norm of
international law. They are the constant denial of the rights, both individually
and collectively, of the 200,000 refugees, more than one third of the Greek
Cypriot population of Cyprus, who were forcibly expelled from their homes during
and following the Turkish invasion. For 26 years, despite the continuous
engagement of the United Nations and the international community to secure a
just and viable solution to the Cyprus Problem, successive Turkish governments
have repeatedly thwarted all efforts, proving in this way, that impunity can be
used in promoting partitionist designs.
These
violations of human rights of the Cypriot people can be summarized as:
- the denial of the rights of the refugees in the enjoyment of their right to property
- the continuing drama of the relatives of missing persons
- the discrimination suffered by the small number of Greek-Cypriots and Maronite-Cypriots who reside in the occupied area
- the destruction and plundering of the cultural heritage of the occupied areas, which is particularly directed at Christian monuments and which constitutes an expression of religious intolerance
- the alteration of the demographic character of the island through the importation of Turkish colonists, in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention
- the violations of the rights of our Turkish-Cypriot compatriots who live in the occupied area under the overbearing presence of 36,000 Turkish soldiers and 98,000 Turkish mainland settlers, and who are forced to emigrate in great numbers.
It
is pertinent to mention that the European Commission on Human Rights of the
Council of Europe in its decision regarding the Fourth Interstate Recourse by
the Cyprus Government against Turkey, which was made public in September of last
year, finds Turkey guilty of gross violations of human rights in Cyprus and in
continuing violation of a number of articles of the European Convention on Human
Rights. Not only did the Commission unanimously adopt and reaffirm three earlier
interstate recourses by Cyprus against Turkey. It also reaffirmed the judgment
of the European Court of Human Rights on the case of a Greek-Cypriot refugee,
Titina Loizidou, in which case the Court had held that the denial to the
applicant of access to her home in the occupied northern part of Cyprus and the
loss of control of her property, was imputable to Turkey. Suffice it to say that
Turkey refuses to abide by the judgement of the Court and pay the claimant the
compensation accorded to her, even after the adoption of two interim resolutions
to that effect by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe.
May
I add, that regarding the homes and properties of displaced persons, the
European Court of Human Rights concluded unanimously that there has been a
continued violation of Article 14, in conjunction with Article 8 of the
Convention, and Article 1 of Protocol 1 of the European Convention of Human
Rights by virtue of the fact that Greek Cypriot owners of property in the
Turkish occupied area are being denied access to use of, and enjoyment of their
property, as well as any compensation for the interference of their property
rights.
The
response of the Turkish side has been a proposal for collective exchange of
properties between Turkish-Cypriots and Greek-Cypriots, as if the rights and
properties of individuals can be disposed of wholesale.
Let
me also recall, Madame Chairperson, that the right of all the people so
violently displaced, to return under conditions of safety and respect for their
human rights and fundamental freedoms, has been demanded by this very
Organization, in UN resolutions including GA resolution 3212 of 1974 which was
adopted unanimously with the consent of Turkey herself. Moreover, it should be
stressed that, both the occupying power and the secessionist entity installed by
it, instead of complying with the verdict of the International Community, as
reflected in the numerous Security Council and General Assembly resolutions, not
only keep on denying and forcibly preventing the return of the displaced
persons, but, even worse, have been flooding - at will and with impunity - the
occupied territory with tens of thousands of Turkish settlers in a systematic
attempt to alter the centuries old demographic composition of the occupied
areas. While the number of colonists swells day by day, the indigenous Turkish
Cypriots are compelled to leave the occupied area of Cyprus, in search of a
better life.
Madame
Chairperson,
I
would like to refer now to the tragic problem of the missing persons in Cyprus
which is still unresolved despite the efforts of the Government of Cyprus and
the relatives of the missing persons. For twenty-six years the families of the
missing continue to live, day-by-day, the uncertainties and the agony of not
knowing the fate of their missing loved ones.
The
Government of Cyprus considers the issue of the missing as a purely humanitarian
problem whose solution is long overdue. In this respect, I would like to inform
you that for the last two years we have proceeded unilaterally with exhumations
in cemeteries in the free areas of the Republic, where enough information was
compiled that the remains of missing persons may be buried. This effort was
undertaken with the participation of the non-governmental organization
“Physicians for Human Rights” and has already led to the identification,
through the DNA process, of the remains of 17 missing persons.
The
Government of the Republic of Cyprus appeals to all who are in a position to
assist the efforts to solve this humanitarian problem, especially the Republic
of Turkey, to exhibit the necessary humanitarian and political will so that the
Committee on Missing Persons resumes its work on the basis of humanitarian
principles embodied in its agreed statutory instrument and to heed the latest
call of the Security Council resolution (S/RES/1217) for the implementation of
the 31st of July 1997 Agreement on the Missing without any further delay or
preconditions so that the families of the missing are finally informed in a
convincing and conclusive manner about the fate of their loved ones.
Madame
Chairperson,
Of
particular interest and great concern to the Government of Cyprus are the
serious violations of the most basic and fundamental human rights of the Greek
and Maronite Cypriots living in the Turkish occupied area. I would like to
remind the Committee, that of the 20,000 Greek and Maronite Cypriots who have
remained in the occupied area in 1974, only 429 remain today. And this despite
the Third Vienna Agreement of 1975, which provided for normal living conditions
of the enclaved.
The
daily life of the Greek and Maronite Cypriots in the occupied area is
characterized by a multitude of adverse circumstances, such as the absence of
normal means of communication and secondary education, the restrictions and
formalities applied to freedom of movement, the impossibility to preserve
property rights upon departure or death, the insufficient number of priests, the
unavailability in practice of Greek Cypriot press and the various other
restrictions which all together create a feeling among the enclaved of being
compelled to live in a hostile environment in which it is hardly possible to
lead a normal private and family life. Their situation has led the
Secretary-General of the United Nations to observe in his report to the Security
Council (S/1996/411) that the Greek Cypriot and Maronite communities in northern
Cyprus “were subjected to severe restrictions
and limitations on many basic freedoms, which had the effect of ensuring that
inexorably, with the passage of time, the communities would cease to exist.”
The
adverse circumstances in the living conditions of Greek and Maronite Cypriots
living in the occupied area, specifically the ones living in the Karpas area,
have also been noted by the European Commission of Human Rights which found that
this clearly discriminatory and degrading treatment is a result of the official
policy pursued by Turkey in violation of Articles 3, 9 and 10 of the European
Convention of Human Rights, as well as Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol 1 of the
aforementioned convention.
Madame
Chairperson,
The
Turkish effort to permanently partition the Republic of Cyprus does not end with
human suffering. It also expands to the deliberate change of historic and
millennia-old names in the occupied area, and to the merciless destruction and
plundering of its cultural heritage, where the most severe destruction has been
suffered by churches and monasteries, in an obvious drive for the total
eradication of everything that would testify that people other than Turks have
ever lived in the occupied land.
Madame
Chairperson,
I sincerely hope that this is the last time that my delegation is compelled to report to the Third Committee on the continuing violations of human rights in Cyprus. We look forward to a successful conclusion of the current effort by the United Nations to finally secure a just and viable solution of the Cyprus Problem, based on Security Council resolutions. Our actions are guided by the desire to see a reunited Cyprus where the protection and promotion of human rights, both on the island and in its international approach, will constitute our most-cherished principles.
* * * * *