Statement by H.E. Mr. Andreas Mavroyiannis
Ambassador, Permanent Representative
of the Republic of Cyprus
to the United Nations
on agenda item 24:
"Return or Restitution of Cultural Property
to the Countries of Origin"
New York, October 31, 2003
Mr. President,
The report of the
Secretary-General on the Return or Restitution of Cultural Property to the
Countries of Origin contained in Document A/58/314, delivers a hopeful message
that much of what needs to be done, is being done, and that important efforts
to protect cultural properties are well on the way to bearing fruitful results.
Though we note that not all the provisions and goals set by the General
Assembly resolutions have been implemented, we believe that UNESCO and its
Director-General deserve to be commended for the significant progress achieved.
We are gratified by, both the contents of the progress report and by the recommendations
contained therein. We welcome also the results of the Twelfth Special
Session of the Intergovernmental Committee, held in
We also commend UNESCO’s efforts to promote bilateral negotiations for the return or restitution of cultural property as a matter of principle and for providing all the legal and moral arguments favoring such restitution. It is to be congratulated also for increasing public awareness for this issue and for assisting in specific cases.
Similarly, we note with satisfaction that
since March 2001, nine more states have joined the 1970 UNESCO Convention and
five more joined the UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or illegally Exported
Objects. These are positive developments that reinforce the campaign against
the illicit trafficking of cultural property. Existing international Conventions
for the protection of world cultural property must be given our full support,
with the goal of increasing the number of ratifications and providing technical
assistance to States with acute problems of illicit trafficking of
archaeological objects, as well as aiding countries in armed conflict.
Mr. President,
Cultural treasures are the visible footprints on the path of man through history. They bring testimony on the ways, found by those who preceded us to decode infinity and constitute the connecting link with the vertical dimension, with the ideals of beauty and humanism, embodying spiritual values and the best of human skills. They are therefore at any given time, at any given place the highest combined expression of the mind and of the work of human hands.
The destruction of cultural
heritage is an old scourge that needs to be eradicated collectively by the
international community in close cooperation with UNESCO, as well as other
relevant UN bodies and multilateral institutions. The return or restitution of
cultural property is not a practice that seeks to empty the Museums of the
world. It is a notion based on the idea that the past enshrines and creates
national identity and pride and therefore some unique objects of that past
should be returned to their rightful place in their countries of origin. The
return or restitution of cultural property to the country of origin is an issue
that contributes to the strengthening of international cooperation both on a
multilateral and bilateral level. In this context, I wish to mention the most
recent renewal of a bilateral agreement between
The
recent examples of the looting of the cultural heritage in
Mr. President,
In
We count on international efforts
to protect ecumenical civilisation to contribute in saving the archaeological
and ecclesiastical monuments and landmarks manifesting the rich cultural
historical background of
In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, let me remind this august body of the words of the ancient poet, Euripides, that the “ Fool is the one who sacks a city, making a desert of temples, pillaging the tombs, the sanctuaries of the dead, for he prepares his own doom in times to come.”
Thank you, Mr. President.
* * * * *